Laserfiche WebLink
Bob Bussel, 3054 Grand Cayman Drive, spoke as the director of Labor, Education, and Research Center at <br />the University of Oregon and as a citizen concerned about the security of the community. He said it was <br />clear the private contractors who were profit-oriented had incentive to keep expenses down and one method <br />of doing so was by providing less extensive training. He asked if, in the wake of the tragic events of <br />September 11,2001, the City wanted workers at the airport who were less qualified to handle emergency <br />situations. He noted that after September 11,2001, the federal government determined that baggage <br />screeners should be government rather than private employees for just this reason. Private contractors also <br />save money by paying less in wages and benefits. <br /> <br />Mr. Bussel asked if the City wanted to risk having workers receive experience with the private contractor <br />and subsequently leave in search of employment that paid better wages and offered better benefits. He asked <br />if the community really wanted to take family-wage jobs and downgrade them as private contractors <br />invariably do. He questioned whether this was the signal the City wanted to send as a matter of public <br />policy and an expression of what the community valued. He felt that the City was prepared to displace <br />committed, highly skilled employees and replace them with lower paid, less-qualified people. He asked the <br />council to let the firefighters continue to perform the needed public service. <br /> <br />Robert Ackerman, 186 Harvey Drive, State Representative of District 13, spoke on the airport privatiza- <br />tion issue. He said public safety had always been a major reason for municipal organization and the citizens <br />have never compromised on this. The post-September 11 environment required that the City maintain the <br />highest level of public diligence and he asserted the privatization of ARFF services at the airport would <br />seriously compromise this. He called it ironic that, in the event of a real emergency, the private fire <br />contractor would have to call the Eugene Fire and EMS as a back-up. Ultimately, he said, this would <br />subsidize the private contractor, and he wondered how this was factored into the bid. <br /> <br />Mr. Ackerman predicted this action would also set a precedent of other public safety functions. He felt that <br />opposition to privatization of police services warranted opposition to the privatization of airport fire <br />services. He thought it "amazing" that the community paid so little attention to the cost of public buildings <br />and commented that "we easily digest" other large expenses, such as $120 million for a new basketball <br />stadium, $350 million for Sacred Heart Hospital, and $75 million for the new courthouse. Mr. Ackerman <br />asserted the cost of airport fire services should be viewed in the context of these enormous costs. <br /> <br />Bruce Miller, PO Box 50968, Eugene, conveyed his agreement with the former speaker. <br /> <br />Mr. Miller said he attended some graduation ceremonies at the University of Oregon. He announced he was <br />running for a seat on the school board for School District 4J. <br /> <br />Gary Gillespie, 790 East 23rd Avenue, opposed contracting out fire and rescue services at the airport. He <br />underscored that not every plane would crash, nor would every passenger experience a medical emergency; <br />but in such an instance, the service was there. He called the service "insurance" against tragedy. He did not <br />think that fares would be lowered should landing fees be lowered. He asked which elected or appointed <br />official wanted to be the first person to have to step before the press and the public and explain what went <br />wrong when something did happen, why it went wrong, and why the services that could have been provided <br />were not there. <br /> <br />Zach ¥ishanoff, Patterson Street, expressed his concern about nanotechnology. He said he provided <br />information on alleged hazards of nanotechnology to the council in writing. <br /> <br />Mr. Vishanoff conveyed his concern regarding the proximity of the railroad tracks to the potential hospital <br />site. He hoped there would be a public hearing on this. He felt it had been difficult to speak at the public <br /> <br /> <br />