My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 3D: Resolution 5083 Annexing Land to the City of Eugene (River Ridge Golf Complex - A 12-6)
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2013
>
CC Agenda - 04/08/13 Meeting
>
Item 3D: Resolution 5083 Annexing Land to the City of Eugene (River Ridge Golf Complex - A 12-6)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/5/2013 11:38:12 AM
Creation date
4/5/2013 11:00:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
4/8/2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
118
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Attachment C - Application Materials <br />In the balance of this section we suggest defining the UGB as being at the mapped <br />boundary between the floodway and the floodplain. This results in a relatively straight <br />north/south line, consistent with the map in the Metro Plan. It will maximize the amount <br />of land in the UGB, which will ensure the most land is available in the existing UGB to <br />accommodate growth. It will also ensure that the floodplain area will be inside the UGB <br />and, hence, available for uses that will support urban development, including bike paths, <br />pedestrian ways, and open space. Generally this option is most consistent with the map of <br />the UGB shown in the Metro Plan, which appears to capture in the UGB the vast majority <br />of the land between Delta Hwy and the river in the area north of Ayres Road. <br />Submitted with this application is a map prepared by Poage Engineering and Surveying, <br />Inc., which shows the proposed UGB line on the west, as the boundary line between the <br />floodway and the floodplain. The map also shows the edge of the floodplain and the odd <br />configuration that would result if that were the UGB line. This map was created by <br />locating FEMA flood elevation data for the floodplain and the floodway on a detailed <br />contour map of the site. This map confirms the point made above, that the floodway <br />boundary (where the floodplain meets the floodway) is a relatively straight north/south, <br />which would make a simple UGB boundary. It also shows that using the start of the <br />floodplain line as the UGB would result in a much more complex line on the ground. <br />The floodplain reflects a large backwater area sticking into the property during the 100 - <br />year flood event. Choosing this line to be the UGB would create an odd - shaped UGB <br />line on the west — one that would feature a large peninsula of urban land sticking out into <br />rural county land. <br />The legal description submitted with this application in Exhibit D includes all the land to <br />the edge of the floodway, as reflected on the Poage map. <br />Here we examine each of the five factors listed in the Metro Plan as relevant to making <br />the UGB site specific in this reach of the UGB perimeter. <br />Protect Ag Lands: The proposed UGB line excludes all Agricultural land from <br />the UGB, as intended by the Metro Plan. <br />Floodway Fringe supports drawing the UGB at the edge of the floodway. In <br />connection with this application, the applicant has had the FEMA floodway line shown <br />on a contour map of the subject property and then described in a metes and bounds <br />description. That metes and bounds description is shown on the map in Exhibit D, <br />prepared by Poage Engineering and Surveying, and is reflected in the legal description of <br />the area requested for annexation. The surveyed map of the floodway matches most <br />closely the generalized map of the UGB line shown in the Metro Plan for this property. <br />The UGB line in the Metro Plan appears to capture nearly all the land between Delta <br />Hwy. and the river in the area that is north of Ayres Road. <br />Protect Wetlands is not particularly relevant to setting the UGB, as the subject <br />property is fully developed with a golf course and related improvements. It is not in a <br />River Ridge Annexation Supporting Narrative — Page 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.