Ordinance No. 20513 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Eugene Water & Electric Board (EWEB) Master Planned Development Transportation Planning Rule (TPR) Analysis Table 3 Potential Development Scenarios October 2012 1 Includes EWEB Administrative Building and the Midgley Building The C -2 zoning, which is the basis for S -DR, allows for the development of a mix of retail, office, and residential uses. Based on an evaluation of the estimated trip generation of the four potential development scenarios shown in Table 3, the "Civic Center" scenario was identified as the reasonable "worst- case" scenario for the proposed S -DR designation. Appendix `E" contains the trip generation estimates developed for each of the four potential development scenarios. Appendix 7" contains the trip internalization calculations for the existing `worst- case" and four potential development scenarios. Table 4 shows the estimated trip generation comparison between the reasonable "worst- case" scenarios for the existing PL zoning and the proposed S -DR zoning. The daily trip estimates in Table 4 have been rounded to the nearest 10 while the peak hour estimates were rounded to the nearest S. As shown in Table 4, the trip generation potential of reasonable "worst- case" development under the proposed Downtown Riverfront (S -DR) zoning will result in fewer peak hour trips than "worst- case" development under the existing public lands (PL) zoning. As such, it is concluded that the proposed rezone can comply with the TPR. No additional intersection analyses are required to measure the potential for a significant affect. j vz/� Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 27 L Land Use Existing PL Designation "Worst Case" 118,000 460,000 9,000 Proposed S -DR Designation Base Scenario 118,000 250 40,000 22,000 14,000 Mixed -Use Residential 118,000 404 85,000 22,000 14,000 Civic Center 118,000 73 315,000 22,000 14,000 New Industry 118,000 85 255,000 28,000 8,000 1 Includes EWEB Administrative Building and the Midgley Building The C -2 zoning, which is the basis for S -DR, allows for the development of a mix of retail, office, and residential uses. Based on an evaluation of the estimated trip generation of the four potential development scenarios shown in Table 3, the "Civic Center" scenario was identified as the reasonable "worst- case" scenario for the proposed S -DR designation. Appendix `E" contains the trip generation estimates developed for each of the four potential development scenarios. Appendix 7" contains the trip internalization calculations for the existing `worst- case" and four potential development scenarios. Table 4 shows the estimated trip generation comparison between the reasonable "worst- case" scenarios for the existing PL zoning and the proposed S -DR zoning. The daily trip estimates in Table 4 have been rounded to the nearest 10 while the peak hour estimates were rounded to the nearest S. As shown in Table 4, the trip generation potential of reasonable "worst- case" development under the proposed Downtown Riverfront (S -DR) zoning will result in fewer peak hour trips than "worst- case" development under the existing public lands (PL) zoning. As such, it is concluded that the proposed rezone can comply with the TPR. No additional intersection analyses are required to measure the potential for a significant affect. j vz/� Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 27