Laserfiche WebLink
Eugene Water & Electric Board (EWEB) Master Planned Development <br />Transportation Planning Rule (TPR) Analysis <br />Table 4 Reasonable "Worst Case" Trip Generation Scenario Comparison <br />October 2012 <br />Daily AM Peak Hour Trips PM Peak Hour Trips <br />Land Use ITE Code size Trips Total In Out out <br />Existing PL Zoning <br />Existing Office <br />118,000 <br />940 <br />175 <br />165 <br />10 <br />165 <br />15 <br />150 <br />Internal <br />714 <br />square feet <br />(20) <br />0 <br />0 <br />0 <br />0 <br />0 <br />0 <br />Office* <br />460,000 <br />5,070 <br />715 <br />630 <br />85 <br />685 <br />115 <br />570 <br />Internal <br />710 <br />square feet <br />(20) <br />0 <br />0 <br />0 <br />0 <br />0 <br />0 <br />Day Care Center <br />5,000 <br />400 <br />60 <br />30 <br />30 <br />60 <br />30 <br />30 <br />Internal <br />565 <br />square feet <br />(30) <br />0 <br />0 <br />0 <br />0 <br />0 <br />0 <br />Bank (w /Drive Thru) <br />590 <br />50 <br />30 <br />20 <br />100 <br />50 <br />50 <br />Internal <br />912 <br />4,000 <br />(40) <br />0 <br />0 <br />0 <br />(5) <br />0 <br />(5) <br />square feet <br />(260) <br />(20) <br />(10) <br />(10) <br />(50) <br />(25) <br />(25) <br />Pass -by (47 %) <br />Net New Trips <br />6,560 <br />970 <br />840 <br />130 <br />955 <br />185 <br />770 <br />Proposed S -DR <br />Zoning <br />Existing Office <br />118,000 <br />940 <br />175 <br />165 <br />10 <br />165 <br />15 <br />150 <br />Internal <br />714 <br />square feet <br />(20) <br />0 <br />0 <br />0 <br />0 <br />0 <br />0 <br />Townhome /Condo <br />290 <br />20 <br />5 <br />15 <br />25 <br />15 <br />10 <br />230 <br />49 units <br />Internal <br />(110) <br />(5) <br />0 <br />(5) <br />(10) <br />(5) <br />(5) <br />Apartment <br />160 <br />10 <br />0 <br />10 <br />15 <br />10 <br />5 <br />220 <br />24 units <br />Internal <br />(60) <br />(5) <br />0 <br />(5) <br />(5) <br />(5) <br />0 <br />Office <br />315,000 <br />3,470 <br />490 <br />430 <br />60 <br />470 <br />80 <br />390 <br />Internal <br />710 <br />square feet <br />(70) <br />(5) <br />0 <br />(5) <br />(5) <br />0 <br />(5) <br />Retail <br />950 <br />25 <br />15 <br />10 <br />80 <br />40 <br />40 <br />Internal <br />820 <br />22,000 <br />(90) <br />0 <br />0 <br />0 <br />(5) <br />0 <br />(5) <br />square feet <br />Pass -by trips (34 %) <br />(290) <br />(10) <br />1 (5) <br />(5) <br />(25) <br />1 (15) <br />(10) <br />Restaurant <br />1,780 <br />160 <br />85 <br />75 <br />155 <br />90 <br />65 <br />Internal <br />932 <br />14,000 <br />(160) <br />(15) <br />(10) <br />(5) <br />(10) <br />(5) <br />(5) <br />square feet <br />Pass -by trips (43 90) <br />(700) <br />(60) <br />(30) <br />(30) <br />(60) <br />(30) <br />(30) <br />Net New Trips <br />6,090 <br />780 <br />655 <br />125 <br />790 <br />190 <br />600 <br />Proposed Zoning - Existing Zoning <br />j (470) <br />j (190) <br />j (185) <br />j (5) <br />j (165) <br />j 5 <br />j (170) <br />*ITE "general office" trip generation includes services such as banks, restaurants, and other support services. <br />Transportation Planning Rule Compliance <br />The following section evaluates the compliance of the proposed land use action with TPR. OAR Section <br />660 -12 -0060 of the TPR sets forth the relative criteria for evaluating plan and land use regulation <br />amendments. Table 5 summarizes these criteria and their applicability to the proposed rezone <br />application. <br />I / Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 28 <br />