Ordinance No. 20513 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Eugene Water & Electric Board (EWEB) Master Planned Development Transportation Planning Rule (TPR) Analysis Table 5 Summary of OAR 660 - 012 -0060 TPR Relative Compliance Criteria October 2012 Criteria Description I Describes how to determine if a proposed land use action results in a significant impact. See response below 2 Describes measures for complying with Criteria #1 where a significant impact is determined. No Describes measures for approving an amendment that would significantly affect an existing 3 transportation facility without assuring that the allowed land uses are consistent with the No function, capacity and performance standards of the facility. 4 Determinations under Criteria #1, #2, and #3 are coordinated with affected transportation See response below facility and service providers and other affected local governments. 5 Indicates that the presence of a transportation facility shall not be the basis for an exception to No allow development on rural lands. 6 Indicates that local agencies should credit developments that provide a reduction in trips. No 7 Outlines requirements for a local street plan, access management plan, or future street plan. No 8 Defines a mixed -use, pedestrian - friendly center or neighborhood. No 9 Describes how a local government may find that an amendment to a zoning map does not No significantly affect an existing or planned transportation facility under specified circumstances. Describes how a local government may amend a functional plan, a comprehensive plan or a 10 land use regulation without applying performance standards related to motor vehicle traffic No congestion if the amendment meets specific multimodal mixed -use area criteria. Describes how a local government may approve an amendment with partial mitigation if the 11 amendment complies with specific criteria, meets a balancing test, and meets coordination No requirements. As noted in Table 5, there are 11 criteria that apply to Plan and Land Use Regulation Amendments. Of these, Criteria #1 and #4 are applicable to the proposed land use action. These criteria are provided below in italics with our response shown in standard font. (1) A plan Orland use regulation amendment significantly affects a transportation facility if it would: (a) Change the functional classification of an existing or planned transportation facility (exclusive of correction of map errors in an adopted plan); (b) Change standards implementing a functional classification system; or (c) Result in any of the effects listed in paragraphs (A) through (C) of this subsection based on projected conditions measured at the end of the planning period identified in the adopted Transportation System Plan (TSP). As part of evaluating projected conditions, the amount of traffic projected to be generated within the area of the amendment may be reduced if the amendment includes an enforceable, ongoing requirement that would demonstrably limit traffic generation, including, but not limited to, transportation demand management. This reduction may diminish or completely eliminate the significant effect of the amendment. I / Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 29